top of page

NEWS

By Sidor Clare, Grade 9


Water pollution is created when damaging substances, usually microorganisms or chemicals, enter and contaminate the water. Some of these pollutants include fertilizer, pesticides, and sewage discharge, all of which have detrimental effects on marine ecosystems, including fish. Fertilizer, usually introduced into water through runoff from farms, and sewage brings nitrogen and phosphorus into lakes, rivers, and oceans. Nitrogen and phosphorus help plants and algae grow, and as the nutrients build up, plants and algae overgrow. When they die, they decay and deplete oxygen levels in the water, causing fish to die. Pesticides, also introduced through runoff, kill fish even in low concentrations. When fossil fuels are burned, heavy metals are introduced into the atmosphere and then deposited in water, which severely impacts a fish’s growth and sense of smell. As a result, fish are unable to evade predators or acquire food. Further, when fish ingest toxins like these, the toxins stay in their system or are passed up the food chain. If we eat a fish that ingested toxins, or a fish that ate that fish, we are eating all of the toxins the fish consumed. We might not think about where our sewage or pesticides end up, but we need to be more aware of and intentional about it. If we aren’t, it will come back to haunt us.


Not only does water pollution kill fish, but it can also change their gender. Certain chemicals called endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) alter the way that hormones work in vertebrates, which include humans and fish. When humans consume drugs with EDCs, they excrete some of the EDC. Wastewater treatment plants are not capable of removing these chemicals from wastewater so they are brought into bodies of water with that wastewater. Male fish living in these areas have been observed changing genders, a process that decreases their fertility. Their biology changes to become more female and some fish even have male and female reproductive organs. A study by the University of Exeter’s Biosciences and the Institute of Environment at Brunel University found that fish who had alternated genders had reduced reproductive performance by up to 76% (1). The presence of EDCs could significantly decrease the population of affected fish. Beyond that, humans are vertebrates as well and the hormone systems of different vertebrates are fairly similar, so the harmful effects these chemicals have on fish might also be seen on humans.


Gender bending and pharmaceutical chemicals can affect fish in other ways as well. In a study conducted by St. Cloud University and the U.S. Geological Survey, male fish exposed to pharmaceutical chemicals did not protect their nests as ferociously as male fish not exposed to those chemicals. Female fish exposed to the same chemicals generally had an increased liver size. Also, minnows exposed to pharmaceutical chemicals had a growth reduction and impaired escape abilities. All of these behaviors could cause a decrease in the fish population.


These problems may seem distant, but if fish populations decrease drastically, it would harm the ecosystems they live in. As a food source and livelihood for humans, environmental changes that negatively impact fish would harm us as well. Last but definitely not least, as consumers of fish products, we could be eating the toxins we put in their habitats.


By Samhita Pokkunuri, Grade 8


Have you ever considered what happens to the world around you when you forget to turn off the sink or spend too much time in the shower? Or put off fixing the pipe leak that's been torturing you for months? Chances are, you probably haven't. But as it turns out, these little details make more of an impact than you think. Did you know that each American uses an average of 88 gallons of water at home a day? That's about 32,000 gallons of water per year! (1) According to the United Nations, around two-thirds of the world's population is likely to face water scarcity by 2025. (2) Yikes. Before you get scared and stop taking showers entirely though, here are five innovative ideas that have helped relieve our world's water crisis.


1) The Eco-Drop Shower: A primary source of excessive water usage is showers. Eco-Drop, created by Tommaso Colia, has pairs of concentric circles that will rise after a while, signaling that your showering is done for the day. (3) Eco-Drop also uses eco-friendly materials; this innovation provides a unique way to conserve water daily. (This was actually made ten years ago, but the invention is still relevant and definitely deserves a spot on this list!)


2) Faucet Buddy: The name of this innovation pretty much describes its purpose. Faucet Buddy, designed by Baek Uyeol, is a small application you add to your faucet or any sink you have around your house. It'll notify you of how much water you've been using to help prevent you from wasting too much on a daily basis. And as a tiny plus, it tells you how hot or cold your shower water is so you know what you are getting into. (4)


3) Bamboo Warkawater Towers: The Bamboo Warkawater Towers look like any ordinary tower to a person who doesn't know what they do. However—and this may seem surprising—these towers can produce 13 to 26.4 gallons of water per day! (5) How? Rain, fog, and dew condense against the mesh outside the structure and go down a funnel into a reservoir, where it’s stored and further condensed into water.


4) Waterpebble: Created by Paul Priestman, this innovative device encourages people to reduce their shower time, as it measures the amount of water going down your plughole as you shower. The light flashes from green to red to symbolize that you are finished showering. This device exponentially reduces your shower time by motivating you to make sure your device is always green! (6) As you continue to use the device, the time it takes for the light to flash from green to yellow to red shrinks.


5) Eco Gadgets - Perfect Flush: Made by Brondell, a manufacturing company, this little gadget's flush system can help you save up to 50% of water! (7) Perfect Flush’s mechanism allows your toilet to run on less water. It comes with two buttons: you can either use a full-flush (therefore emptying the tank), or a half-flush, meaning that the toilet will only use about 50-70% of the water necessary to flush your toilet. Not only does it conserve tons of water, but it also takes only 30 minutes to install, making it an efficient, easy-to-use device!


These five innovations have made an impact on the water crisis today. Without them, we'd likely be suffering a far worse fate than we are already. But just because there are innovations out there to help conserve water doesn't mean your job is complete—your actions still make a difference, no matter how small, and there are tons of ways you can help conserve water in your daily life. One thing is absolutely clear: there is still a bubble of hope, and you can make that bubble bigger.


(1) https://www.epa.gov/watersense/statistics-and-facts

(2) https://www.seametrics.com/blog/water-conservation-facts/

(3) https://www.igreenspot.com/the-eco-drop-shower-by-tommaso-colia/

(4) https://www.yankodesign.com/2008/01/15/faucet-buddy-tells-you-about-water/

(5) https://www.wired.com/2015/01/architecture-and-vision-warkawater/

(6) https://www.waterpebble.com/

(7) https://ecofriend.com/eco-gadgets-perfect-flush-makes-any-toilet-save-up-to-50-water.html

Cover photo from myownwater.com

By Zoe Xu, Grade 11


Enter a McDonald’s anywhere in America and you can buy a cheeseburger for a dollar. Americans eat approximately 0.6 pounds of meat a day, totaling 222 pounds in a year. (1) It’s no revelation that meat is practically part of the American psyche, nor is it surprising that globally, the water footprint of meat accounts for a third of the entire agriculture industry (2)— which already constitutes 70% of the world’s water usage. (3) After all, each pound of beef has a water footprint of 1800 gallons, while a pound of pork takes around 576 gallons (4) and chicken hides 519 gallons. (5)


Those numbers might seem excessive, but remember that animals aren’t born full-grown and ready for consumption. We’re all probably familiar with the concept of the energy pyramid which indicates this: every time energy (or any resource) transfers up through another consumer in the pyramid, we lose 10% of that energy. Of course, this is a bit of a simplification, but the idea that it costs more to consume beef instead of soy, or chicken instead of lentils, remains. Of the water that it takes to create a pound of beef, 98% goes to the cow’s diet (6)— not its water intake, but to maintain grass pastures and grow feed. Even when the meat industry is broken down from small farms to industrial systems, the water footprint is significant in both; small farms are less efficient than industrial systems because those cows are normally grass-fed, move often, and take longer to mature, which increases water usage, but industrial systems see an increase in their blue and grey water footprint due to the process of growing and making feed, as well as diluting the resultant pollutants from the manufacturing of feed. (7) For better reference, the global average for the water footprint of a pound of lettuce is 15 gallons, avocado is 220 gallons, and potatoes are 30 gallons. (8) There’s evidently variation for plant products, but meat, especially beef, egregiously outstrips the water footprints of vegetables. And in a world increasingly threatened by water shortage, where the UN’s projections for 2025 (9) predict that 30 nations will be water-scarce and the projections for 2030 place global water demand at 40% more than the usable supply (10), it seems every gallon of water counts — and with these circumstances, the prominence of the meat industry’s water footprint is worrying.


Of course, none of us can control the meat industry directly — that depends on government regulation. However, as individual consumers, we can be aware of the industries and companies we give our support to and the impacts of what we eat or use, and consciously choose more environmentally friendly products. Perhaps you’ve already thought of an alternative source of protein; you can find lists of popular substitutes in almost any vegetarian blog. After all, there’s a wide variety of high-protein plants to choose from: soy, lentils, potatoes, sweet corn, hempseed, almost any kind of bean, peas, quinoa, oats, chia seeds, most nuts… the list goes on. You’ll even find protein in bananas. Beyond that, there’s the option of seitan, which is high in protein and resembles the texture of regular meat. There are healthy and enjoyable alternatives for meat out there and those alternatives could drastically reduce the water footprint of agriculture.


You might find it difficult still to give up meat entirely, and that’s understandable. For instance, chicken nuggets are a phenomenon outside of time, a classic and (to some) a comfort food. This is far from a call for all of us to become vegetarians — after all, there’s no push for everyone to stop taking baths to decrease individual water consumption, but there is a call to decrease shower times and not choose a bath every day. Likewise, there are probably replacements in your diet that can be made without going fully vegetarian if you’re anything like the average American; for instance, replacing a steak with tofu once a week and choosing to eat meats with smaller water footprints, or packing a quinoa salad for work instead of planning to grab a burger from a fast food joint at lunch. Every shift of habit towards water conservation is important, and in a setting where water shortage is an excruciatingly real threat looming in our future, it’s our civic and moral responsibility to find ways to minimize and be more conscious of our water footprints.


Cover photo from Water Online

Clearwater Innovation

A program of We Impact Corp, a 501(c)(3) non-profit company 

A student-run environmental advocacy program founded by Emily Tianshi and Kyle Tianshi, Clearwater Innovation seeks to raise awareness about the global water crisis, encourage garage lab research, and increase student environmental public policy engagement. 

© 2018 by We Impact Corp

logo1_画板 1.png
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
bottom of page